Register

APACHE CLIPS IS A NOT FOR PROFIT SITE DEDICATED TO OUR ARMED FORCES.

ALL PROFITS GENERATED WILL BE DONATED TO THE WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT OR THE SEMPER FI FUND.


WELCOME GUEST, BE SURE TO REGISTER AS A MEMBER, SO THAT YOU CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ALL THE FEATURES WE HAVE TO OFFER!
BE SURE TO CHECK OUT FAQ SECTION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Missouri, USA
    Posts
    2,940
    Like
    4,036
    Dislike
    15

    Default U.S. Army Seeks New Shooter Game

    U.S. Army Seeks New Shooter Game
    Jul. 23, 2012 - 11:31AM |
    By MICHAEL PECK

    The U.S. Army is in the market for a next-generation first-person-shooter (FPS) training game that will incorporate the latest video game technology. The game will replace Virtual Battlespace 2, the Army’s official tactical training game since 2008.

    With a July 12 close date for questions and comments, officials are likely now digesting responses to a June draft Request for Proposal. Published by the Army’s Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation, it essentially calls for an updated version of VBS2 rather than a revolutionary change in gaming. VBS2, from Bohemia Interactive Simulations, has become the mothership of tactical simulations for the U.S. Army and Marine Corps, as well as other nations such as Britain and Australia.

    There are a plethora of add-ons and modifications, from IED training to foreign language instruction, plus versions for Special Operations Command and spinoffs such as VBS2 Fires for indirect fire training. The Army wants the next-generation sim to continue to work with these add-ons, thus eliminating the need to reinvent the virtual wheel. It also wants the sim to operate on PC, Web-based and mobile platforms, and integrate into a live-virtual-constructive environment. The plan is to have industry offer solutions to these requirements, including how to adapt the latest gaming technology.

    “We are letting the multibillion dollar gaming industry develop the revolutionary capabilities; then we will select the technologies that satisfy our requirements,” said Rob Bowen, chief of the Training and Doctrine Command Capability Manager for Gaming (TCM-Gaming).

    PEO STRI declined to comment on the draft proposal.

    In addition to the RFP, a 243-page technical requirements document and a 13-page checklist spell out what the Army is looking for. The game should be able to run on two different hardware configurations: an Intel Core 2 Duo processor with 4 gigabytes of RAM, the Windows 7 operating system and 512-megabyte Nvidia Quatro video card, as well as a faster Intel i7 processor with an AMD FirePro 1-gigabye video card. It must include specific terrain databases, including terrain for the Middle East, tropical areas, Eastern Europe, high-desert and mountains, and U.S. urban environments. It must also allow players to call for indirect fire and air strikes using communications systems such as Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP).

    Game publishers are reluctant to comment at this stage, but they do say that the state of the art has advanced considerably.

    “Most FPS games support multi-core processing and photo-realistic 3D rendering,” said Bohemia Interactive CEO Peter Morrison. “Many engines now support publishing to multiple platforms, such as PC, mobile and Web browser, which generally wasn’t possible five years ago. There has also been a wide-spread maturity and acceptance of middleware, which is encouraging from a re-use perspective. In short, the game engines of today are more versatile than those previously available.”

    The FPS contract is estimated to be $44.5 million over five years, with the bulk of that funding for technical support and annual licensing for an Army-wide enterprise license.

    Morrison did not say that Bohemia will go for the contract when it is finally released, though that seems likely, as is a response from America’s Army, the U.S. Army’s recruiting game, which is also used for many training applications. VBS2 edged out “America’s Army 3” during the first — and somewhat controversial — selection process.

    Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of PEO STRI’s draft RFP is mention of a potential family of games that go well beyond tactical training. These include a Construction and Management Simulation to “to support full spectrum operations that includes lethal and non-lethal tasks and missions. The gaming solution must portray the political, military, economic, social, informational, and infrastructural (PMESII) conditions and associated second- and higher-order effects of decision-making relative to those conditions.” Other possible acquisitions include a massive multiplayer online game, a real-time strategy game (“Starcraft” is an example of the genre), and a turn-based strategy game (such as the “Civilization” series).
    http://www.defensenews.com/article/2...xt|FRONTPAGE|p
    For any support questions please contact the AC staff team via the Contact form - or via email apacheclips@gmail.com.

    Thank you.

  2. #2
    Corporal
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    56
    Like
    4
    Dislike
    0

    Default

    I worked on the Americas Army project from July 2001-ish until 2008 (It's been a while, I'll have to double check the dates... regardless it was from inception until the 2.8 release). In my opinion 2.8 ruined the heart of the game and that is when I made my exit.

    I hope that if they decide to do this again they focus on their key needs first and not what the lemmings are begging for so that a pimply faced 12 year old can play it. (ahem... vehicles ruined the game... cough cough).

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Jax Fl
    Posts
    6,339
    Like
    6,672
    Dislike
    141

    Default

    I have been with the Americas Army game since its start its last version in the series 2.8 had a lot of faults but was the best version of the game. The new Americas army game 3.0 sucked that why it was beat out. The 2.8 series if it had more effects and more interactive mobile units it would have been the greatest simulator to date.
    Right now ARMA series is about the best fps and interactive sim out there as far I know, everyone has a different opinion
    For any support questions please contact the AC staff team via the Contact form - or via email apacheclips@gmail.com.

    Thank you.

    Remember Members to rate and comment on vids Thank You
    Apaceclips Staff


  4. #4
    mrfrosty
    Guest

    Default

    .
    Last edited by mrfrosty; 06-09-2013 at 09:40 PM.

  5. Likes

    Hellfreeza (08-04-2012),jamieooh (07-26-2012),serpa6 (07-29-2012)
  6. #5
    The big Kahuna
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,283
    Like
    77
    Dislike
    2

    Default

    I know the difference between VBS2 and ARMA 2 - and not only the price - I am just not sure what they want, the whole point of the Army Game was fast access - they don;t get that with a game like ARMA 2 or VBS2 that is hard to learn.
    For any support questions please contact the AC staff team via the Contact formor via email apacheclips@gmail.com.

    AC Guidelines read them



    100%er

  7. #6
    Sergeant
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    222
    Like
    145
    Dislike
    2

    Default

    Yeah I personally was disapointed with ARMA, but I was suprised how many did like it.

  8. #7
    Corporal
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    20
    Like
    1
    Dislike
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lostfound30 View Post
    Yeah I personally was disapointed with ARMA, but I was suprised how many did like it.
    When combined with addons like ACE and ACRE it really comes into its own.

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to Top