PDA

View Full Version : Nuke That Slick



perocity
05-05-2010, 11:12 PM
The Russians know how to fix a deepsea oil leak - they nuke it!
6878

As BP prepares to lower a four-story, 70-ton dome over the oil gusher under the Gulf of Mexico, the Russians — the world’s biggest oil producers — have some advice for their American counterparts: nuke it.

...in Soviet times such leaks were plugged with controlled nuclear blasts underground. The idea is simple, KP writes: “the underground explosion moves the rock, presses on it, and, in essence, squeezes the well’s channel.”

Yes! It’s so simple, in fact, that the Soviet Union, a major oil exporter, used this method five times to deal with petrocalamities. The first happened in Uzbekistan, on September 30, 1966 with a blast 1.5 times the strength of the Hiroshima bomb and at a depth of 1.5 kilometers. KP also notes that subterranean nuclear blasts were used as much as 169 times in the Soviet Union to accomplish fairly mundane tasks like creating underground storage spaces for gas or building canals.

These kinds of surgical strikes to shut off underground leaks, however, were carried out only five times, with the last one occuring in 1979. And there was only one misfire, near Kharkov, Ukraine, where a nuclear blast was unable to stanch a gas leak.

Happily, with a track record like that, “the chances of failure in the Gulf of Mexico are 20%,” KP writes. “The Americans could certainly risk it.”
Read more: http://trueslant.com/juliaioffe/2010/05/04/nuke-that-slick/

ianstone
05-06-2010, 10:16 AM
Now who would you trust with finger on the trigger of a nuke in your own backyard

Yono
05-06-2010, 03:10 PM
In Soviet Russia nuke cleans you!

DevilDog812
05-06-2010, 03:53 PM
who says it has to be a nuke though? im sure we have big enough conventional precision bombs that we could do it easily without the resulting mess of using a nuke

Toki
05-06-2010, 04:48 PM
who says it has to be a nuke though? im sure we have big enough conventional precision bombs that we could do it easily without the resulting mess of using a nuke

Precision bombs mean nothing under a mile deep of water. Using a nuke essentially moves the ocean floor. But, it's an idiotic idea. You'd radiate the Gulf on Mexico, hurting the fishing economy of the nations surrounding it.

atrox6661
05-07-2010, 08:42 AM
Ya but the oilleak will also do this, besides underwater atomic detonations don't leave allot of residue radition, in the bikini island nuclear test site there is very little radiation today and the wildlife population wasn't wiped out.

Besides that the explosion could make the problem worse.

Yono
05-07-2010, 12:59 PM
I think it is an idiotic idea. There are much safer ways of removing oil, even if it does cost a lot of money. BP's fault, BP pays.
I mean think about it for a sec....nuking an oil leak?