PDA

View Full Version : Euros Say No to More Afghan Troops



bobdina
12-02-2009, 11:28 AM
Euros Say No to More Afghan Troops
December 01, 2009
Agence France-Presse

France and Germany refused US requests to immediately promise more troops for Afghanistan, frustrating President Barack Obama's hopes that allies would match his troop surge.

Britain has already offered an extra 500 troops and Italy has said it will send an unspecified number but Poland and other contributors are among those waiting to see what happens in Afghanistan.

US officials say Obama is about to announce a surge of 30,000 troops and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown this week predicted other nations would provide another 10,000.

A French minister said Tuesday that President Nicolas Sarkozy had refused a US request for more troops. But Le Monde newspaper quoted a Sarkozy aide as saying that France was weighing the request and could agree to boost its presence as long as the fresh troops focus on training Afghan forces.

"You know the president's answer, it's 'no'," Pierre Lellouche, the minister for Europe and a former envoy to Afghanistan, said in a French television interview. Sarkozy said last week that no more French troops would go to Afghanistan.

Le Monde reported that Obama was seeking 1,500 extra French troops for Afghanistan, on top of the 3,400 already there. It quoted a member of Sarkozy's staff as saying France would wait to see what happens at a conference on Afghanistan in London on January 28.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said her country would also wait until after the London meeting.

"We are expecting requests from the United States but we will not take a decision in the coming days, we will do so after the conference on Afghanistan," Merkel said after talks in Berlin with Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani.

"After this conference on Afghanistan, Germany will decide whether or not it will make fresh efforts, and if so, what efforts," Merkel said, adding that security in Afghanistan would not be solved by military means alone.

Germany has around 4,300 troops in northern Afghanistan, the third largest contributor to a 100,000-strong international force after the United States and Britain, whose extra 500 troops will take it past 10,000 in the war.

Brown set three conditions for Britain sending extra troops to Afghanistan.

These were that the Afghan government show a commitment to providing police and soldiers who can be trained to engage in combat; that British troops are properly equipped and that other NATO countries also boost force levels.

The conditions have now all been met, the prime minister said this week in announcing the reinforcements, saying that eight NATO countries had already made offers of additional troops and others were likely to follow.

Poland will decide within a month whether to beef-up its contingent of 2,000 troops in Afghanistan by up to a thousand new soldiers, Prime Minister Donald Tusk said Tuesday.

"Political decisions will be taken at the end of this year or the beginning of the next," Tusk told Polish Radio, specifying that the "technical aspects" of a possible troop increase would be examined in early 2010.

Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd pledged Monday to send more police trainers and civilian aid experts to Afghanistan, saying his country was in it "for the long haul."

But Rudd, who met in Washington this week with Obama, did not offer more troops beyond 1,550 Australia has already committed.


http://www.military.com/news/article/euros-say-no-to-more-afghan-troops.html?col=1186032307786

MickDonalds
12-02-2009, 12:34 PM
Germany has such a horseshit military now because of their inaction and blatant refusals to leave the wire. They've lost ALL credibility. Russia would stomp the lights out of Berlin if it came through the Fulda Gap nowadays. They're now as worthless as Spain is (Madre Dios! We lost one soldier, we're leeeeeaaaaavvvvviiiinnnnggg!!!!!).