PDA

View Full Version : Single mom refuses to deploy to care for baby



bobdina
11-17-2009, 05:20 PM
Single mom refuses to deploy to care for baby

By Russ Bynum - The Associated Press
Posted : Tuesday Nov 17, 2009 14:59:29 EST

SAVANNAH, Ga. — An Army cook and single mom may face criminal charges after she skipped her deployment flight to Afghanistan because, she said, no one was available to care for her infant son while she was overseas.

Spc. Alexis Hutchinson, 21, claims she had no choice but to refuse deployment orders because the only family she had to care for her 10-month-old son — her mother — was overwhelmed by the task, already caring for three other relatives with health problems.

Her civilian attorney, Rai Sue Sussman, said Monday that one of Hutchinson’s superiors told her she would have to deploy anyway and place the child in foster care.

“For her it was like, ‘I couldn’t abandon my child,’ ” Sussman said. “She was really afraid of what would happen, that if she showed up they would send her to Afghanistan anyway and put her son with child protective services.”

Hutchinson, who is from Oakland, Calif., remained confined Monday to the boundaries of Hunter Army Airfield in Savannah, 10 days after military police arrested her for skipping her unit’s flight. No charges have been filed, but a spokesman for the Army post said commanders were investigating.

Kevin Larson, a spokesman for Hunter Army Airfield, said he didn’t know what Hutchinson was told by her commanders, but he said the Army would not deploy a single parent who had nobody to care for his or her child.

“I don’t know what transpired and the investigation will get to the bottom of it,” Larson said. “If she would have come to the deployment terminal with her child, there’s no question she would not have been deployed.”

Hutchinson’s son, Kamani, was placed into custody of local child welfare officials for “less than two days” when she was arrested and jailed briefly, Larson said. Hutchinson’s mother picked up the child a week ago and took him back to her home in California.

Hutchinson, who’s assigned to the 3rd Combat Aviation Brigade of the Army’s 3rd Infantry Division, joined the Army in 2007 and had no previous deployments, Sussman said. She said Hutchinson is no longer in a relationship with the father.

The Army requires all single-parent soldiers to submit a care plan for dependent children before they can deploy to a combat zone.

Hutchinson had such a plan — her mother, Angelique Hughes, had agreed to care for the boy. Hughes said Monday she kept the boy for about two weeks in October before deciding she couldn’t keep him for a full year.

Hughes said she’s already having to care for her ailing mother and sister, as well as a daughter with special needs. She also runs a day-care center at her home, keeping about 14 children during the day.

“This is an infant, and they require 24-hour care,” Hughes said. “It was very, very stressful, just too much for me to deal with.”

Hughes said she returned Kamani to his mother in Georgia a few days before her scheduled deployment Nov. 5.

She said they told her daughter’s commanders they needed more time to find another family member or close friend to help Hughes care for the boy, but Hutchinson was ordered to deploy on schedule.

Larson, the Army post spokesman, said officials planned to keep Hutchinson in Georgia as investigators gathered facts about the case.

“Spc. Hutchinson’s deployment is halted,” Larson said. “There will be no deployment while this situation is ongoing.”

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/11/ap111609_singlemom_deploy/

nastyleg
11-17-2009, 05:27 PM
my only remark is this....If she knew that she was going to have a conflict with her family care plan then why not quite the Army under hardship discharge?

bobdina
11-17-2009, 05:36 PM
Since she didn't try any bullshit that we know off (like saying the war is wrong and the US is evil like some other people who refuse deployment) I tend to believe she really thought her mom could handle and she was going to go with the program and be deployed, till her mother threw a monkey wrench into things. I can just see a 2nd LT. telling her it's a bullshit excuse you have to go and she did what she did. If that's the case her OIC is going to bite the big one when the investigation is done. If i'm just blowing hot air with my dumb ass comments she's gonna be biting the big one.

nastyleg
11-17-2009, 05:43 PM
I have met some dumb officers in my time and yes that seems like a comment that a 2nd Lt who does not want to fight for thier enlisted soldier would say. Lt's are afraid of the CO however they should fear the fuery and fight of the Sgt's have when a Lt is F'ed up.

The chain of command always says officer out rules an enlisted soldier....always. However in real life it is the NCO who runs the show and who's advice those officers seek when they can not come up with a solution to a simple problem. Not saying officers are incapable but the newly commissioned Lt has a lot of growing up to do and it is the NCO that helps them do it.

WretchedDevice
11-18-2009, 04:46 PM
Ma'am, we can do this the hard way or the easy way, your choice..lol


Take the ticket, take the ride..thats what I always say.....