PDA

View Full Version : Navy repostions ships to take over missile defence



bobdina
09-20-2009, 01:41 PM
The Navy will begin to maintain a constant presence of at least two or three ballistic-missile defense cruisers and destroyers in the waters around Europe by 2011, the Pentagon announced Sept. 17, to protect the continent from potential Iranian missile attacks.

The standing patrol would sail the North Sea and the Mediterranean to cover Europe from the north and south, and U.S. commanders could surge additional ships to provide extra assistance when needed, said Marine Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The new mission is part of President Barack Obama’s strategy to provide missile defense for Europe, a change that does away with the land-based missiles and radars initially backed by the Bush administration.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who recommended the change along with the Joint Chiefs, cited a two-part rationale for the shift, saying that the intelligence community’s 2006 assessment of the Iranian threat had changed and that analysts now believe the threat from Iran’s short- and medium-range missiles, such as the Shahab-3, “is developing more rapidly than previously projected.”

This poses an “increased and more immediate threat to our forces on the European continent, as well as to our allies,” Gates said, while the threat of potential Iranian intercontinental ballistic missile capability “has been slower to develop.”

Cartwright and Gates said that sea-based BMD protection could cover Europe until the U.S. and its allies field land-based radars and a new version of the Navy’s Standard Missile-3 interceptor missile, some time toward the end of the next decade. Until then, the U.S. will rely on the sensors and ample missile tubes aboard Navy warships, Cartwright said.

“A single Aegis [warship] can carry a hundred — plus or minus a few, depending on their mission configuration — of the SM-3,” Cartwright said. “If [the threat] doesn’t emerge, we don’t have to build [new interceptors] but if it does, we’re ready to basically go after it.”

A cruiser has 122 Vertical Launch System tubes. Arleigh Burke-class destroyers have 90 or 96 VLS tubes. The ships usually deploy with a mixed arsenal of SM-2, SM-3, anti-submarine, Evolved Sea Sparrow and Tomahawk missiles. Sailing as an all-SM-3-armed BMD barge, charged only with defending against ballistic-missile attacks, would be a new mission for an Aegis warship.
East Coast BMD expansion

It’s likely that the ships assigned to the Europe-area patrol mission will come from the East Coast. The Navy and the Missile Defense Agency want to make nine East Coast-based Aegis ships BMD-capable by 2014 — three that had already been slated for the upgrade and six requested in this year’s budget. MDA will recommend that all of them be from the Atlantic Fleet.

Today, 18 ships are equipped with Aegis BMD, and all but two are based in the Pacific.

The three ships already set to get upgrades are the cruisers Vella Gulf and Monterey, based at Naval Station Norfolk, Va., and the destroyer The Sullivans, based at Naval Station Mayport, Fla. The six additional ships haven’t been named.

A second phase of the U.S. missile-defense regime will be in place by 2015, Cartwright said, and will include land-based sensors and SM-3s, but it was not clear whether that would mean an end to the standing Aegis BMD presence in Europe.

Worldwide, the system eventually will integrate the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense missile, or THAAD, slated for operational deployment to Europe this year, and the Ground-Based Interceptor missile based at Fort Greely, Alaska, and at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., Cartwright said.

It also would include construction of a directional X-band radar somewhere in Europe, most likely in the Caucasus region, Cartwright said.

ghost
09-20-2009, 01:55 PM
Interesting. I think the Naval ballistic missile defense(BMD) systems will work very well. As the system proved itself last year, when they shot down that errant satellite. What do you think would happen if we shot down an Iranian ICBM? The Iranians would probably call it an "act of war", even though they would have been the ones firing the missile...

What do you think about this system, Bob?

Reactor-Axe-Man
09-21-2009, 12:06 PM
It'll work great - right up until the point where we need those ships somewhere else. Nice going, Big 0.

ghost
09-21-2009, 01:34 PM
It'll work great - right up until the point where we need those ships somewhere else. Nice going, Big 0.


Yeah, I suppose that we are using a lot of ships for this. Do you know how many, exactly?

Reactor-Axe-Man
09-21-2009, 09:17 PM
I had read three aegis ships (either Ticos or Arleigh Burkes) would be required to provide effective coverage. In order to maintain round the clock availability, the Navy needs three ships for every billet. This allows one ship to be on station, another in refit/repair/maintenance, and a third working up for the next deployment. Now as the article I read did not specify whether or not that was three ships on station (meaning we need nine total), or whether they are intending on one ship to cover the entire eastern Med (the three ships indicated).

In any case, that's between three and nine aegis warships offlined from other duties to do a job a land based system could have covered by itself, and earned goodwill and rapport with eastern Europe while it was doing it.

ghost
09-22-2009, 11:05 AM
I had read three aegis ships (either Ticos or Arleigh Burkes) would be required to provide effective coverage. In order to maintain round the clock availability, the Navy needs three ships for every billet. This allows one ship to be on station, another in refit/repair/maintenance, and a third working up for the next deployment. Now as the article I read did not specify whether or not that was three ships on station (meaning we need nine total), or whether they are intending on one ship to cover the entire eastern Med (the three ships indicated).

In any case, that's between three and nine aegis warships offlined from other duties to do a job a land based system could have covered by itself, and earned goodwill and rapport with eastern Europe while it was doing it.


Hmm. Point taken. Thanks for clearing that up.